Nerman Fatic vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs R. Pacheco Mendez

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

225

C. Rank

233

191

Best Rank

196

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$57.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez

MEX

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

225

C. Rank

233

191

Best Rank

196

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$57.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Mendez

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez was at the Modena Challenger, 28-06-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	1
Mendez	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Modena Challenger(06-28-23)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez

N. Fatic vs R. P. Mendez H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	R. P. Mendez
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$57,200
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	48.19% (80-86)
1	Clay	0
12	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	25.00% (1-3)

N. Fatic vs R. P. Mendez Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 45.47% of points on their second serve, while Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has won 45.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has won 46.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.11% and 26.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has saved 57.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez winning 43.33% (W/L 26/34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 4/2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 39/50).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.91% of matches (W/L 18/26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez winning 0.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez was at the Modena Challenger, 28-06-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:26.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.83 while Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has played against players with an average rank of 252.15.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez has converted 27.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs R. P. Mendez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	R. P. Mendez
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
6	Aces (Total)	2
4	Total Double Faults	2
1:33:26	Average Match Time	1:33:26
63% (41/65)	1st Serve %	58% (31/53)
78% (32/41)	1st Serve Win %	68% (21/31)
42% (10/24)	2nd Serve Win %	32% (7/22)
67% (4/6)	Break Pts Won %	10% (1/10)
47% (25/53)	Return Points Win %	35% (23/65)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

R. P. Mendez Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bogota Challenger - 24-11-2025
R1 Facundo MenaF. Mena	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Guayaquil Challenger - 17-11-2025
R1 Facundo MenaF. Mena	L	3-6 6-0 6-0	Stats
Montevideo Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Gustavo HeideG. Heide	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Lima 3 Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Gonzalo VillanuevaG. Villanueva	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Costa do Sauipe Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 Emilio NavaE. Nava	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs R. P. Mendez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	R. P. Mendez
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	48.19% (80/86)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	48.70% (187/197)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	50.34% (1825/1800)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	52.11% (37/34)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	43.82% (39/50)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	66.67% (4/2)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.31
1598	Aces Total	542
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.28
1517	Total Double Faults	495
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1:41:14
509.47	Average Opponent Rank	351.52
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	61% (6553/10737)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	68% (4446/6553)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (2124/4183)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (447/1122)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	40% (4453/11169)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	33.33% (1/2)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	60.00% (3/2)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	11.11% (1/8)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	38.38% (38/61)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	74.00% (37/13)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (79/165)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	46% (26/56)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (24/52)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (79/65)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (79/14)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (87/14)